This
is part eight of a nine part series will illuminating the FAA’s
complacency and the role the FAA’s concession played in the
violence against Water Protectors. A listing of the other eight
articles is at the bottom of this article.
The Standing Rock
Sioux are an independent nation. Many treaty and Native American
legal authorities assert the Native American nations have authority
to determine airspace requirements and regulations over their nation.
The Paris Convention
for the Regulation of Air Navigation, an international agreement
clarifying rules of airspace, states that nation states that nations
have the right to control their own airspace, deny entry into their
airspace, and regulate flights. It also states that other nations
will comply with each nation’s airspace rules.
While the issue of
Native American nation’s airspace is largely unlitigated in
American Courts, Native American nations have asserted authority over
their own airspace and federal courts have upheld the rights of
municipalities of lower authority than the federal government to
create their own restriction on flights.
Several tribes have
asserted the right to sole control over their airspace. The
Constitution of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation includes, “all waters
and air space within the Indian Country . . . over which the Citizen
Potawatomi Nation has authority.”
The
Hualapai Nation successfully asserted its jurisdiction over its
airspace in a case where a man was flying over at low altitude in a
glider. He took off from federal land and landed on federal land but
flew over the reservation. He was charged with trespass and plead
guilty. However, it was not litigated in federal court and it is
unknown how successful such an assertion of tribal authority would be
in the future.
The
FAA asserts it is the one with exclusive right to determine flights.
“A
tribe has no authority over airspace and cannot charge people for
using it. The federal government has sole jurisdiction over the
nation’s airspace.” said FAA spokesman Ian Gregor.”
However,
The Supreme Court has stated that “a hallmark of Indian sovereignty
is the power to exclude non-Indians from Indian lands.”
The
Treaty of 1868 includes what is called “the bad man provision.”
It requires the American government to prosecute any non-tribe
members who behave badly against a tribe member.
It
reads:
If bad men among the whites, or among other people subject to the authority of the United States, shall commit any wrong upon the person or property of the Indians, the United States will, upon proof made to the agent and forwarded to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs at Washington city, proceed at once to cause the offender to be arrested and punished according to the laws of the United States, and also reimburse the injured person for the loss sustained.
If bad men among the whites, or among other people subject to the authority of the United States, shall commit any wrong upon the person or property of the Indians, the United States will, upon proof made to the agent and forwarded to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs at Washington city, proceed at once to cause the offender to be arrested and punished according to the laws of the United States, and also reimburse the injured person for the loss sustained.
In the case of
Standing Rock, the aircraft has posted a physical health risk in the
case of the sleep deprivation and the attempts to demount riders. The
flights are being used to prosecute tribe members. The helicopters
are being used to terrorize Water Protectors.
While the tribe has yet to
formally assert any rights over their airspace, the right to control
who enters it is the airspace over the reservation may be theirs to
assert. By entering it, and by doing harm, the bad man provision may
be triggered and if it is, the federal government has a duty to
punish the bad men.
After reading this part, I am curious to read previous parts as this seems interesting. hope they will be as interesting as this one
ReplyDelete